ORANGE PROGRAM
Module III: Philosophical Works
Target Group
Grades 7-8
Prerequisites
Module I & II or equivalent
Length
3 months
Lesson Time
45 mins/lesson
Meets twice a week
Class Size
1-on-1
Mode
Distance Learning
Detailed Lesson Plan:
Week 1a: Reading Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave”—what is it?
Week 1b: Diagramming the “Allegory of the Cave”
Week 2a: Discussing the problems with “Allegory of the Cave”
Week 2b: Writing Task #1 and in-class evaluation and feedback
Week 3a: Reading Descartes’ “First Meditation”—what is it?
Week 3b: Breaking down “I think, therefore I am”—premises and conclusions
Week 4a: Proving/disproving “I think, therefore I am”
Week 4b: Writing Task #2 and in-class evaluation and feedback
Week 5a: Reading Kant’s “Categorical Imperative”—what is it?
Week 5b: Introduction to Kantian ethics
Week 6a: Discussing the problems with the “Categorical Imperative”
Week 6b: Writing Task #3 and in-class evaluation and feedback
Week 7a: Reading Jeremy Benthan’s theory of utilitarianism—what is it?
Week 7b: Discussing the pros and cons of utilitarianism
Week 8a: In-class debate: Kant versus Bentham
Week 8b: Writing Task #4 and in-class evaluation and feedback
Week 9a: Reading an excerpt from Satre’s Existentialism is a Humanism
Week 9b: What is existentialism?
Week 10a: What is individualism and why is it important to existentialism?
Week 10b: Writing Task #5 and in-class evaluation and feedback
Week 11a: Overview of Plato, Descartes, Kant, Bentham and Sartre
Week 11b: In-class debate: pretend to be a major philosopher
Week 12a: Final Writing Project #1 and in-class evaluation/feedback
Week 12b: Final Writing Project #2 and in-class evaluation/ feedback
Class Title: Module III
Objectives:
✓ Critically review philosophical texts from philosophers such as Plato, Descartes, Kant, Bentham, and Sartre
✓ Practice breaking down arguments from major philosophers
✓ Apply your understanding of philosophical inquiry, ethics, and logic in writing to form your own philosophical perspective(s)
Learning Outcomes:
✓ Can identify premises, conclusions, and arguments in writings from philosophers
✓ Gain a strong understanding of how a logical argument is formed, defended, and refuted
✓ Gain a deeper understanding of how to apply philosophy to multiple disciplines
Class Timeline:
✓ 45 mins. per lesson (10 minutes for instruction, 30 minutes for discussion & debate, and 5 minutes for homework review & Q/A)
✓ Have lessons twice per week
Lesson Overview:
Part 1:
✓ Who is Plato?
✓ What is Plato’s Allegory of the Cave?
✓ What are the Five Stages in the Allegory of the Cave?
✓ What are the problems with the Allegory of the Cave?
✓ Writing Task #1: “What is the purpose of knowledge?”
✓ Evaluation & feedback
Part 2:
✓ Who is René Descartes?
✓ What is Descartes’ “First Meditation?”
✓ What does “I think, therefore I am” mean?
✓ Can we prove or disprove the statement, “I think, therefore I am?”
✓ Writing Task #2: “Does thinking come before existing?”
✓ Evaluation & feedback
Part 3:
✓ Who is Immanuel Kant?
✓ What is Kant’s “Categorical Imperative?”
✓ Do you agree or disagree with Kant? Why or why not?
✓ What are the problems with the “Categorical Imperative?”
✓ Writing Task #3: “How should we treat others?”
✓ Evaluation & feedback
Part 4:
✓ Who is Jeremy Bentham?
✓ What is his theory of utilitarianism?
✓ Do you agree or disagree with utilitarianism? Why or why not?
✓ What are the problems with utilitarianism?
✓ Writing Task #4: “Is there such a thing as a ‘greater good?’”
✓ Evaluation & feedback
Part 5:
✓ Who is Jean-Paul Sartre?
✓ What is existentialism?
✓ What is individualism?
✓ Why are individualism and existentialism complicated?
✓ Writing Task #5: “What is my greater purpose?”
✓ Evaluation & feedback
Part 6:
✓ Which philosopher do you identify with the most?
✓ Which philosopher do you identify with the least?
✓ Final Writing Project #1: Form a written defense of a philosopher
✓ Evaluation & feedback
✓ Final Writing Project #2: Form a written critique of a philosopher
✓ Evaluation & feedback